Key result
Home morning BP monitoring shows better reproducibility and stronger vascular correlation than ambulatory monitoring.
Why the study?
It remained unknown whether morning blood pressure assessed by 24-hour ambulatory or home monitoring is more reproducible and more closely associated with vascular injury.
Does home morning blood pressure monitoring provide better reproducibility and stronger association with vascular injury compared to ambulatory morning blood pressure monitoring in untreated outpatients?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,049)
Does home morning blood pressure monitoring provide better reproducibility and stronger association with vascular injury compared to ambulatory morning blood pressure monitoring in untreated outpatients?
Absolute Event Rate: 5% vs 11%
p-value: p=<0.05
Home morning blood pressure monitoring may be preferred over ambulatory measurements due to better reproducibility and stronger correlation with vascular injury indices.
Morning blood pressure (BP) is recommended to be assessed by either 24-hour ambulatory or home BP monitoring. By which methods morning BP assessed is more reproducible and more closely associated with vascular injury remains unknown. We, therefore, addressed this issue in 1049 referred untreated outpatients (51.9% women; average age, 51 years) who had performed 24-hour ambulatory and 7-day home BP monitoring and vascular evaluations. Irrespective of the assessment methods, morning BPs were all significantly ( P≤0.027) associated with the arterial measures. The partial correlation coefficients of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio with home morning BPs were greater than those with the ambulatory morning pressures among the first 2 hours after awakening (0.21-0.37 versus 0.15-0.24; P<0.05). The associations with home morning systolic BP remained significant ( P≤0.002) after full adjustment for evening BP, whereas those with ambulatory morning BPs became nonsignificant after full adjustment for 24-hour BP except that of the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity with ambulatory morning (6:00-10:00) systolic BP. Of the 135 subjects who had both home and repeated 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring within 1 month, the coefficients of variation were ≈11% for ambulatory morning BPs and 5% for home self-measurements. In conclusion, morning BP, irrespective of the assessment methods and definitions, was generally reproducible and significantly associated with vascular indices. Nevertheless, home morning BP might be preferred than ambulatory measurements because of better reproducibility and stronger correlation with vascular indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Untreated outpatients (n=1,049). Home morning BP monitoring vs. 24-hour ambulatory morning BP monitoring was evaluated on Reproducibility and associations with vascular injury (p=<0.05). Home morning blood pressure monitoring showed better reproducibility (CV 5% vs 11%) and stronger correlation with vascular indices (r=0.21-0.37 vs 0.15-0.24; P<0.05) than ambulatory monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: