Key result
Non-Newtonian blood simulation estimates ~45% higher local blood viscosity and greater endothelial shear stress.
Why the study?
Does a non-Newtonian blood model estimate different endothelial shear stress and local blood viscosity compared to a Newtonian model?
Does a non-Newtonian blood model estimate different endothelial shear stress and local blood viscosity compared to a Newtonian model?
Effect estimate: 1.45 times higher LBV
p-value: p=<0.001
Incorporating non-Newtonian blood behavior in simulations yields higher endothelial shear stress estimates and allows calculation of local blood viscosity, potentially improving the detection of underlying atherosclerosis.
Non-Newtonian models may refine ESS estimates in simulations; leaves open clinical relevance for atherosclerosis detection.
< 0.001 distal) On average, the non-Newtonian model has a LBV of 1.45 times above the Newtonian model with an average peak LBV of 40-fold. Non-Newtonian blood model estimates higher quantitative ESS values than the Newtonian model. Incorporation of non-Newtonian blood behavior may improve the accuracy of ESS measurements. The non-Newtonian model also allows calculation of exploratory viscosity-based hemodynamic indices, such as local blood viscosity, which may offer additional information to detect underlying atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thondapu et al. (2022) studied Atherosclerosis. Non-Newtonian blood model vs. Newtonian model was evaluated on Local blood viscosity (LBV) and endothelial shear stress (ESS) (1.45 times higher LBV, p=<0.001). Non-Newtonian blood model simulation estimated higher quantitative endothelial shear stress and a local blood viscosity 1.45 times above the Newtonian model (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: