Key result
Women with HFpEF face higher hospitalization rates despite similar outcomes from medical therapies across sexes.
Why the study?
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is more prevalent in women and involves sex-specific pathophysiology, but clinical outcomes and therapeutic strategies between sexes remain unresolved.
Are there sex-specific differences in the pathophysiology, risk factors, outcomes, and treatment responses in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
Are there sex-specific differences in the pathophysiology, risk factors, outcomes, and treatment responses in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?
This review highlights the need for further investigation into sex-specific pathophysiology and the potential development of sex-specific therapies for HFpEF, given its higher prevalence and distinct risk factor profiles in women.
Sex-neutral HFpEF therapy remains appropriate; leaves open whether sex-specific strategies can reduce women's higher hospitalization rates.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents the most frequent form of heart failure in women, with almost two-fold higher prevalence than in men. Studies have revealed sex-specific HFpEF pathophysiology, and suggested the possibility of a sex-specific therapeutic approach in these patients. Some cardiovascular risk factors, such as arterial hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and race, show specific features that might be responsible for the development of HFpEF in women. These risk factors are related to specific cardiovascular changes-left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and hypertrophy, ventricular-vascular coupling, and impaired functional capacity-that are related to specific cardiac phenotype and HFpEF development. However, there is no agreement regarding outcomes in women with HFpEF. For HFpEF, most studies have found higher hospitalization rates for women than for men. Mortality rates are usually not different. Pharmacological treatment in HFpEF is challenging, along with many unresolved issues and questions raised. Available data on medical therapy in patients with HFpEF show no difference in outcomes between the sexes. Further investigations are necessary to better understand the pathophysiology and mechanisms of HFpEF, as well as to improve and eventually develop sex-specific therapy for HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tadić et al. (2019) conducted a review in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction exhibits sex-specific pathophysiology and higher hospitalization rates in women, but medical therapies show no difference in outcomes between sexes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: