Why the study?
Does preventive closure of the left atrial appendage prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation compared to oral anticoagulation?
Does preventive closure of the left atrial appendage prevent cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation compared to oral anticoagulation?
Left atrial appendage closure presents a viable alternative for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients who have contraindications to or high bleeding risks from oral anticoagulation.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmias, and a major cause of morbidity and mortality due to cardioembolic stroke. The left atrial appendage is the major site of thrombus formation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Loss of atrial systole in atrial fibrillation and increased relative risk of associated stroke point strongly toward a role for stasis of blood in left atrial thrombosis, although thrombus formation is multifactorial, and much more than blood flow irregularities are implicated. Oral anticoagulation with vitamin-K-antagonists is currently the most effective prophylaxis for stroke in atrial fibrillation. Unfortunately, this treatment is often contraindicated, particularly in the elderly, in whom risk of stroke is high. Moreover, given the risk of major bleeding, there is reason to be skeptical of the net benefit when warfarin is used in those patients. This work reviews the pathophysiology of cardioembolic stroke and critically spotlights the current status of preventive anticoagulation therapy. Various techniques to exclude the left atrial appendage from circulation were discussed as a considerable alternative for stroke prophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leithäuser et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: