Key result
Vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women were not associated with differences in low frequency heart rate variability compared to those without symptoms (MD 2.715; 95% CI -0.124 to 5.555; p=0.06).
Why the study?
The menopausal transition is associated with increased CVD risk and vasomotor symptoms potentially linked to autonomic nervous system changes, but the relationship with heart rate variability is unclear.
Does heart rate variability differ between peri- and post-menopausal women with and without vasomotor symptoms?
Systematic Review
Does heart rate variability differ between peri- and post-menopausal women with and without vasomotor symptoms?
Mean Difference: 2.715 (95% CI -0.124–5.555)
p-value: p=0.06
This meta-analysis found no significant differences in heart rate variability between peri- and post-menopausal women with and without vasomotor symptoms, though high heterogeneity limits the conclusions.
The menopausal transition is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are highly prevalent during this period, potentially due to autonomic nervous system (ANS) changes. This systematic review examines whether heart rate variability (HRV), a noninvasive marker of autonomic function, differs between women with and without VMS. Five databases were searched. Studies were included if they assessed HRV in women with and without VMS while in peri‐ and/or post‐menopause. Means, standard deviations, and sample sizes were extracted. Pooled standardized mean differences were calculated using a random‐effects model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q and I 2 statistics. Three studies were suitable for meta‐analysis. The pooled analysis revealed no difference in low frequency (LF) in women with VMS compared to those without VMS (Difference in means: 2.715 [95% CI: −0.124 to 5.555]; p = 0.06). There were no group differences in high frequency (HF) ( p = 0.11). High heterogeneity was observed in both LF (Q = 73.96, p < 0.001, I 2 = 97%) and HF (Q = 61.82, p < 0.001, I 2 = 97%). Women with VMS and without VMS did not show differences in HRV. Larger, standardized studies are needed to better understand the relationship between autonomic function, VMS, and CVD risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hira et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) vs. Women without VMS was evaluated on Low frequency (LF) heart rate variability (MD 2.715, 95% CI -0.124 to 5.555, p=0.06). Vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women were not associated with differences in low frequency heart rate variability compared to those without symptoms (MD 2.715; 95% CI -0.124 to 5.555; p=0.06).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: