PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Journal of Public Health0 citationsOpen Access

Experiences of professional public health advocacy in the UK health and social care system: a qualitative survey study using the Theoretical Domains Framework

View Full Paper
KMKaat MarynissenNewcastle UniversityAPAkshay PabaryNewcastle UniversityMMMalcolm MoffatNewcastle University

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore barriers and enablers to public health advocacy by UK specialists.
  • Online survey distributed to public health specialty trainees, consultants, and practitioners in the UK.
  • Free-text responses analyzed using template analysis and the Theoretical Domains Framework.
  • Sixty-four respondents completed the survey.
  • Role clarity, organizational support, and advocacy skills significantly affect ability to advocate.
  • Barriers include unclear responsibilities, fear of consequences, resource constraints, and inadequate training.
  • Supportive leadership and shared values facilitate successful advocacy.

Abstract

Abstract Background Advocacy of public health principles (PHP) is crucial to tackling health inequities. Advocacy skills are therefore a core competency of Public Health speciality training in the UK. A survey of UK-trained specialist registrars found that the perceived ability to advocate for PHP varied significantly across work settings. This study explores barriers and enablers to PHP advocacy across workplaces, offering insights into how advocacy can be better supported in the UK public health landscape. Methods An online survey was sent to UK-based public health specialty trainees, consultants, and public health practitioners on the portfolio route to consultant practice currently. Free-text survey responses were analysed using template analysis and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results Sixty-four respondents completed the survey. This study found that role clarity, organizational support, and advocacy skills significantly affect public health specialists’ ability to advocate. Barriers included unclear responsibilities, fear of consequences, resource constraints, and inadequate training and mentorship. Supportive leadership and shared values facilitated success. Conclusions To promote advocacy, the Faculty of Public Health should ensure specialists are positioned as autonomous experts, address biases in recruitment, and integrate advocacy skills further into training. Organizations must evaluate how their structure, culture, and leadership support public health advocacy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marynissen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b983e7dec685947ac3b2https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdag035
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper