Key result
AI-guided FoCUS by novices detects LVEF <40% with ~96% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Heart failure is prevalent, but there is currently no cost-effective screening option.
Does AI-guided focused cardiac ultrasound performed by novices accurately detect left ventricular dysfunction compared to formal echocardiography in adults referred for diagnostic echocardiography?
Observational (n=496)
Blinded assessors
Does AI-guided focused cardiac ultrasound performed by novices accurately detect left ventricular dysfunction compared to formal echocardiography in adults referred for diagnostic echocardiography?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AI-guided focused cardiac ultrasound enables novice users to accurately detect left ventricular dysfunction with minimal training, offering a potential low-cost screening tool.
Aims Heart failure is prevalent; however, there is no cost-effective screening option. Against formal echocardiography, we assessed the diagnostic performance of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS), performed by novice users guided and interpreted by artificial intelligence (AI) for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods/Results We prospectively enrolled 496 adults referred for diagnostic echocardiography. Novice operators (without clinical or imaging experience) underwent a 4-hour imaging workshop, then performed FoCUS using a point-of-care device (Philips Lumify) utilizing real-time AI-image guidance (UltraSight). Images were assessed by AI-image interpretation software (Mayo Clinic), and two expert blinded echocardiologists. Median age was 67, 39% female, and body mass index range 17-56 kg/m². 41 subjects (8.3%) exhibited moderate or greater LV dilatation and 28 (5.6%) had LVEF <40%. The median scan time was 4 mins (IQR 3-5). Adequate views were achieved in 95.0% and 97.4% of subjects for AI interpretation and expert analysis, respectively. A two-step diagnostic screening process for low EF in which only abnormal AI reads or uninterpretable scans were reviewed by experts (15.1%) had a sensitivity 96.2%, specificity 95.4%, PPV 54.3%, and NPV 99.8%. A subsequent prospective validation study of 344 subjects demonstrated similar results (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.4%). Conclusion In this early feasibility investigation, AI-guidance technology embedded on a handheld device, enabled novice users without clinical or imaging experience to acquire sufficient quality images to accurately assess LVEF with minimal training. The technology evaluated in this study may hold promise for AI-guidance and interpretation to facilitate low-cost screening for cardiac dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kane et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Left ventricular dysfunction (n=496). AI-guided focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) vs. Formal echocardiography was evaluated on Diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity) for detecting low LVEF (<40%). A two-step AI-guided focused cardiac ultrasound screening process by novices detected left ventricular ejection fraction <40% with 96.2% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: