Key result
AI-augmented POCUS enables novices to reliably estimate LVEF in 96% of ICU patients.
Why the study?
AI algorithms have been developed to assist non-experts in POCUS, but the feasibility, accuracy, and reliability of novice users estimating LVEF using POCUS-AI echo in the ICU setting remained to be tested.
Does AI-augmented POCUS enable novice users to accurately and reliably estimate LVEF in ICU patients compared to expert sonographers?
Observational (n=75)
Does AI-augmented POCUS enable novice users to accurately and reliably estimate LVEF in ICU patients compared to expert sonographers?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.88-0.94; Specificity 90%, Sensitivity 56-70%
AI-enhanced POCUS allows novices to feasibly and reliably estimate LVEF in ICU patients, with high specificity but moderate sensitivity for detecting LVEF ≤ 40%.
May support novice AI-POCUS for ICU LVEF screening; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation against experts before practice change.
Background: Echocardiography is crucial to understanding cardiac function in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), often by measuring the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Traditionally, measures of LVEF are completed as part of a comprehensive examination by an expert sonographer or cardiologist, but front-line practitioners increasingly perform focused point-of-care estimates of LVEF while managing life-threatening illness. The two main echocardiographic windows used to grossly estimate LVEF are parasternal and apical windows. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have recently been developed to assist non-experts in obtaining and interpreting point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) echo images. We tested the feasibility, accuracy and reliability of novice users estimating LVEF using POCUS-AI echo. Methods: A total of 30 novice users (most never holding an ultrasound probe before) received 2 h of instruction, then scanned ICU patients (10 patients, 80 scans) using the Exo Iris POCUS probe with AI guidance tool. They were permitted up to 5 min to attempt parasternal long axis (PLAX) and apical 4 chamber (A4C) views. AI-reported LVEF results from these scans were compared to gold-standard LVEF obtained by an expert echo sonographer. To further assess accuracy, this sonographer also scanned another 65 patients using Exo Iris POCUS-AI vs. conventional protocol. Results: Novices obtained images sufficient to estimate LVEF in 96% of patients in <5 min. Novices obtained PLAX views significantly faster than A4C (1.5 min vs. 2.3 min). Inter-rater reliability of LVEF estimation was very high (ICC 0.88–0.94) whether images were obtained by novices or experts. In n = 65 patients, POCUS-AI LVEF was highly specific for a decreased LVEF ≤ 40% (SP = 90% for PLAX) but only moderately sensitive (SN = 56–70%). Conclusions: Estimating cardiac LVEF from AI-enhanced POCUS is highly feasible even for novices in ICU settings, particularly using the PLAX view. POCUS-AI LVEF results were highly consistent whether performed by novice or expert. When AI detected a decreased LVEF, it was highly accurate, although a normal LVEF reported by POCUS-AI was not necessarily reassuring. This POCUS-AI tool could be clinically useful to rapidly confirm a suspected low LVEF in an ICU patient. Further improvements to sensitivity for low LVEF are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallant et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients (n=75). AI-augmented Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) vs. Conventional echocardiography by an expert sonographer was evaluated on Feasibility, accuracy, and reliability of estimating LVEF (ICC 0.88-0.94; Specificity 90%, Sensitivity 56-70%). AI-augmented POCUS enabled novices to estimate LVEF in 96% of ICU patients in <5 minutes, demonstrating high inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.88-0.94) and 90% specificity for LVEF ≤40%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: