Key result
Carotid sinus massage elicited similar rates of cardioinhibitory (24.2% vs 25.8%) and vasodepressor (8.1% vs 13.6%) responses in patients with and without syncope (p=0.466).
Why the study?
Does carotid sinus massage elicit different hemodynamic responses in patients with syncope compared to those without?
Cross-Sectional (n=165)
Does carotid sinus massage elicit different hemodynamic responses in patients with syncope compared to those without?
Absolute Event Rate: 24.2% vs 25.8%
p-value: p=0.466
Carotid sinus massage elicits similar hemodynamic responses in patients with and without syncope, suggesting that carotid sinus hypersensitivity is a nonspecific finding of dubious diagnostic value.
BACKGROUND: Carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) is a frequent finding in the evaluation of syncope. However, its significance in the clinical setting is still dubious. A new criterion was proposed by Solari et al. with a symptomatic systolic blood pressure (SBP) cut-off value of ≤ 85 mmHg to refine the vasodepressor (VD) response diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the response to carotid sinus massage (CSM) in patients with and without syncope according to standard and proposed criteria. METHODS: CSM was performed in 99 patients with and 66 patients without syncope. CSH was defined as cardioinhibitory (CI) for asystole ≥ 3 seconds, or as VD for SBP decrease ≥ 50 mmHg. RESULTS: No differences in the hemodynamic responses were observed during CSM between the groups, with 24.2% and 25.8% CI, and 8.1% and 13.6% VD in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, respectively (p = 0.466). A p value < 0.050 was considered statistically significant. During the maneuvers, 45 (45.45%) and 34 (51.5%) patients in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups achieved SBP below ≤ 85 mmHg. Symptoms were reported especially in those patients in whom CSM caused a SBP decrease to below 90 mmHg and/or asystole > 2.5 seconds, regardless of the pattern of response or the presence of previous syncope. CONCLUSION: The response to CSM in patients with and without syncope was similar; therefore, CSH may be an unspecific condition. Clinical correlation and other methods of evaluation, such as long-lasting ECG monitoring, may be necessary to confirm CSH as the cause of syncope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Syncope (n=165). Carotid sinus massage vs. Patients without syncope was evaluated on Cardioinhibitory response to carotid sinus massage (p=0.466). Carotid sinus massage elicited similar rates of cardioinhibitory (24.2% vs 25.8%) and vasodepressor (8.1% vs 13.6%) responses in patients with and without syncope (p=0.466).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: