Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates electrical stimulus spread in cochlear implants, suggesting improved design for stimuli.
Cochlear implants (CIs) have tremendously helped people with severe to profound hearing loss to gain access to sound and oral-verbal communication. However, the electrical stimulus in the cochlea spreads easily and widely, since the perilymph and endolymph (i.e., intracochlear fluids) are essentially electrolytes, leading to an inability to focus stimulation to discrete portions of the auditory nerve, which blurs the neural signal. Here, we characterize the complex transimpedances of human cadaveric cochleas to investigate how electrical stimulus spread is distributed from 10 Hz to 100 kHz. By using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), both the resistive and capacitive elements of human cochleas are measured and modeled with an electrical circuit model, identifying spread-induced and spread-independent impedance components. Based on this electrical circuit model, we implement a Laplace transform to simulate the theoretical shapes of the spread signals. The model is validated by experimentally applying the simulated stimulus as a real stimulus to the cochlea and measuring the shapes of the spread signals, with relative errors of <0.6% from the model. Based on this model, we show the relationship between stimulus pulse duration and electrical stimulus spread. This EIS technique to characterize the transimpedances of human cochleas provides a new way to predict the spread signal under an arbitrary electrical stimulus, thus providing preliminary guidance to the design of CI stimuli for different CI users and coding strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: