Why the study?
It was unknown whether the aortic to femoral arterial stiffness gradient is associated with CVD risk factors and CVD status, and whether these associations differ from cfPWV.
Is the aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient (af-SG) associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors and status compared to carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (cfPWV) in older adults?
Is the aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient (af-SG) associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors and status compared to carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (cfPWV) in older adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aortic-femoral arterial stiffness gradient may be a more comprehensive marker of cardiovascular disease status than traditional carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity in older adults.
BACKGROUND: The aortic to femoral arterial stiffness gradient (af-SG) may be a novel measure of arterial health and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but its association with CVD risk factors and CVD status, and whether or not they differ from the referent measure, carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (cfPWV), is not known. METHOD: Accordingly, we compared the associations of the af-SG and cfPWV with (i) age and traditional CVD risk factors and (ii) CVD status. We evaluated 4183 older-aged (75.2 ± 5.0 years) men and women in the community-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. cfPWV and femoral-ankle PWV (faPWV) were measured using an automated cardiovascular screening device. The af-SG was calculated as faPWV divided by cfPWV. Associations of af-SG and cfPWV with age, CVD risk factors (age, BMI, blood pressure, heart rate, glucose and blood lipid levels) and CVD status (hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke) were determined using linear and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: (i) the af-SG and cfPWV demonstrated comparable associations with age and CVD risk factors, except BMI. (ii) a low af-SG was associated with diabetes, coronary heart disease, heart failure and stroke, whilst a high cfPWV was only associated with diabetes. CONCLUSION: Although future studies are necessary to confirm clinical utility, the af-SG is a promising tool that may provide a unique picture of hemodynamic integration and identification of CVD risk when compared with cfPWV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stone et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: