Key result
Low HDL-C predicts ~22% higher CHD risk in White adults only, and high HDL-C lacks protection.
Why the study?
The study aimed to understand why coronary heart disease risk equations underperform in Black adults.
Does the association of HDL-C levels with incident CHD differ between Black and White adults?
Population
23,901 CHD-free Black and White adults aged >=45 years
Comparison
Plasma lipid levels compared across Black and White adults
Design
Prospective cohort study
Follow-up
Median 10 years
Authors
Loading...
Low HDL-C raises CHD risk in Whites but not Blacks; challenges race-uniform HDL-C thresholds and leaves open race-specific validation.
Cohort (n=23,901)
Yes
Does the association of HDL-C levels with incident CHD differ between Black and White adults?
Effect estimate: HR 1.22 (White) / HR 0.94 (Black) (95% CI 1.05-1.43 (White) / 0.78-1.14 (Black))
p-value: p=0.08
Low HDL-C is associated with increased CHD risk in White but not Black adults, suggesting current HDL-C-based risk calculators may be inaccurate for Black patients.
Zakai et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=23,901). Plasma lipid levels (HDL-C) vs. Normal HDL-C was evaluated on Incident CHD (myocardial infarction or CHD death) (HR 1.22 (White) / HR 0.94 (Black), 95% CI 1.05-1.43 (White) / 0.78-1.14 (Black), p=0.08). Low HDL-C increased incident CHD risk in White adults (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.05-1.43) but not Black adults (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.78-1.14), and high HDL-C was not protective in either group.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: