Key result
Paroxysmal AF is linked to ~51% greater risk of major events during ablation wait-times.
Why the study?
Wait-times resulting from demand outpacing capacity for catheter ablation in AF, and the clinical consequences of such delays, have not been comprehensively evaluated at a population level.
Are prolonged wait-times for atrial fibrillation ablation associated with increased morbidity and mortality in adults referred for the procedure?
Cohort (n=6,253)
Yes
Are prolonged wait-times for atrial fibrillation ablation associated with increased morbidity and mortality in adults referred for the procedure?
Effect estimate: HR 1.51 (95% CI 1.18-1.93)
Wait-times for AF ablation are increasing and are associated with significant morbidity, highlighting the clinical consequences of delayed access to this therapy.
Wait-times for AF ablation were associated with morbidity; leaves open whether expedited access reduces events in prospective data.
AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disorder. Emerging evidence supporting the efficacy of catheter ablation in managing AF has led to increased demand for this therapy, potentially outpacing the capacity to perform this procedure. Mismatch between demand and capacity for AF ablation results in wait-times which have not been comprehensively evaluated at a population level. Additionally, the consequences of such delays in AF ablation, namely the risk of hospitalization or adverse events, have not been studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational cohort study included adults referred for catheter ablation to treat AF in Ontario, Canada, between 1 April 2016 and 31 March 2020. Wait-time was defined from referral to the earliest of ablation, death, off-list, or the study endpoint of 31 March 2022. The outcomes of interest included a composite of death, hospitalization for AF/heart failure, and emergency department visit for AF/heart failure. Our study cohort included 6253 patients referred for de novo AF ablation. The median wait-time for patients who received and who did not receive ablation was 218 days (IQR: 112-363) and 520 days (IQR: 270-763), respectively. Wait-time increased consistently for patients referred between October 2017 and March 2020. Mortality was rare, but significant morbidity was observed, affecting 19.2% of patients on the waitlist for AF ablation. Paroxysmal AF was associated with a statistically significant greater risk for adverse outcomes on the waitlist (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18-1.93). CONCLUSION: Wait-times for AF ablation are increasing and are associated with significant morbidity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qeska et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=6,253). Wait-time for atrial fibrillation ablation was evaluated on Composite of death, hospitalization for AF/heart failure, and emergency department visit for AF/heart failure (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18-1.93). Wait-times for atrial fibrillation ablation were associated with significant morbidity in 19.2% of waitlisted patients, with paroxysmal AF increasing adverse outcome risk (HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.18-1.93).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: