Key result
Systematic diagnostic approach to syncope improves diagnostic accuracy and identifies high-risk patients.
A systematic approach to syncope evaluation, including thorough history and physical exam, is essential for accurate diagnosis and identifying high-risk patients with structural heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support systematic syncope evaluation in EDs; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Syncope is common representing approximately 3% of ED visits and up to 6% of hospital admissions, with a cost close to 2 billion dollars per year. Diagnostic testing is often poorly sensitive and evaluations commonly lack a standardized approach. A mindful and systematic approach can increase sensitivity and improve diagnostic accuracy. A thorough history and physical exam is paramount, as conclusions drawn from the history and exam will guide further assessment. Developing a strategy for the first and, if necessary, subsequent tests will improve the accuracy of identifying the etiology of syncope and reduce cost. Although syncope has a favorable prognosis, identification of patients with structural heart disease is critical, as these patients are at greatest risk for mortality. Several risk scoring systems have been developed to help separate high risk from low risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray et al. (2014) conducted a review in Syncope. A systematic diagnostic approach to syncope, which accounts for approximately 3% of ED visits and up to 6% of hospital admissions, improves diagnostic accuracy and identifies high-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: