Key result
Pacemakers for AV block, unlike SND, linked to ~200% higher death or retransplant risk.
Why the study?
Prior studies have shown conflicting findings regarding the effect of pacemaker implantation on survival in orthotopic heart transplant recipients.
Does pacemaker implantation for atrioventricular block or sinus node dysfunction increase the risk of retransplant or death in orthotopic heart transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=1,511)
No
Does pacemaker implantation for atrioventricular block or sinus node dysfunction increase the risk of retransplant or death in orthotopic heart transplant recipients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In heart transplant recipients, the need for pacemaker implantation due to atrioventricular block, but not sinus node dysfunction, is associated with a significantly increased risk of death or retransplantation.
BACKGROUND: Bradyarrhythmias including sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrioventricular block (AVB) can necessitate pacemaker (PPM) implantation in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients. Prior studies have shown conflicting findings regarding the effect of PPM implantation on survival. We evaluated the effect of PPM indication on long-term re-transplant-free survival in OHT patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of OHT patients at UCLA Medical Center from 1985 to 2018. Indication for PPM (SND, AVB) was identified. Cox proportional hazards model with pacemaker implantation as a time-varying covariate was used to evaluate its effect on the primary endpoint of retransplant or death. We included 1609 OHTs in 1511 adult patients with median follow-up of 12 years. RESULTS: At transplant, patients were aged 53 ± 13 years and 1125 (74.5%) were male. Pacemakers were implanted in 109 (7.2%) patients; 65 for SND (4.3%) and 43 for AVB (2.8%). Repeat OHT was performed in 103 (6.4%) cases and 798 (52.8%) patients died during the follow-up period. The risk of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in patients requiring PPM for AVB (HR 3.0, 95% CI 2.1-4.2, p < .01) after controlling for age at OHT, gender, hypertension, diabetes, renal disease, history of repeat OHT, acute rejection, transplant coronary vasculopathy, and atrial fibrillation, but not PPM for SND (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.70-1.4, p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who required PPM for AVB, but not SND, were at significantly higher risk of death or retransplant compared to patients who did not require PPM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
H. et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Orthotopic heart transplant recipients (n=1,511). Pacemaker implantation for atrioventricular block (AVB) or sinus node dysfunction (SND) vs. No pacemaker implantation was evaluated on Retransplant or death (HR 3.0, 95% CI 2.1-4.2, p=< .01). Pacemaker implantation for atrioventricular block, but not sinus node dysfunction, was associated with a significantly higher risk of death or retransplant (HR 3.0; 95% CI 2.1-4.2; p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: