Key result
Balloon-to-annulus ratio ≤1.2 during valvuloplasty is linked to less pulmonary insufficiency without compromising procedural efficacy.
Why the study?
Does a conservative balloon:annulus ratio of ≤1.2 reduce pulmonary insufficiency compared to a ratio of >1.2 in patients undergoing balloon valvuloplasty for congenital pulmonic stenosis?
Cohort (n=98)
No
Does a conservative balloon:annulus ratio of ≤1.2 reduce pulmonary insufficiency compared to a ratio of >1.2 in patients undergoing balloon valvuloplasty for congenital pulmonic stenosis?
p-value: p=0.008
Using a conservative balloon:annulus ratio of ≤1.2 during pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty significantly reduces pulmonary insufficiency without compromising procedural efficacy.
May favor conservative balloon sizing to limit insufficiency in pulmonic stenosis; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary insufficiency following balloon valvuloplasty for pulmonary valve stenosis has been shown to result in right ventricular dilation, which may necessitate pulmonary valve replacement. This study investigates the consequences of employing a more conservative balloon:annulus ratio of ≤1.2 against the currently used ratios of >1.2. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether a more conservative balloon:annulus ratio would maintain procedural success with adequate relief of the pulmonary valve gradient, while minimizing pulmonic insufficiency. DESIGN: Procedural data were collected on cases considered for balloon valvuloplasty for congenital pulmonic stenosis at Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego between March 31, 2003 and April 9, 2014. The study includes 98 patients whose median age at the time of procedure was 3.6 months (range: 1 day to 271 months); median follow-up was 15.2 months (range 24 days to 106 months). The subjects were divided into two groups based on their balloon:annulus ratio: ≤1.2 (n = 67) and >1.2 (n = 31). RESULTS: The difference in pulmonary gradient reduction-the marker of procedural success-was not significant between the two groups (P = .33). Although both groups had an increase in pulmonary valve insufficiency from baseline, the ≤1.2 group had significantly less insufficiency compared to the >1.2 group (P = .008). Reintervention rates were not statistically significant between both groups (P = .89). CONCLUSION: Performing pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty with a balloon:annulus ratio of ≤1.2 produces significantly less pulmonary insufficiency than a ratio of >1.2 without reducing procedure efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pathak et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Congenital pulmonic stenosis (n=98). Balloon valvuloplasty with balloon:annulus ratio ≤1.2 vs. Balloon valvuloplasty with balloon:annulus ratio >1.2 was evaluated on Pulmonary gradient reduction and pulmonary valve insufficiency (p=0.008). Balloon valvuloplasty with a balloon:annulus ratio ≤1.2 produced significantly less pulmonary insufficiency than a ratio >1.2 (P=0.008) without reducing procedural efficacy (P=0.33).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: