Key result
Pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty using a balloon-to-annulus ratio of 1.2-1.5 significantly improved the degree of pulmonic stenosis in dogs, with continued improvement at 90 days in severe cases.
Why the study?
Does the balloon-to-annulus ratio (BAR) affect the efficacy of pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty in dogs with pulmonic stenosis?
Does the balloon-to-annulus ratio (BAR) affect the efficacy of pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty in dogs with pulmonic stenosis?
In a canine model of pulmonic stenosis, pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty with a balloon-to-annulus ratio of 1.2-1.5 was effective regardless of single or double balloon technique.
May guide interventional management of pulmonic stenosis in dogs; leaves open optimal ratios and long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: In dogs, treatment of pulmonic valve stenosis (PS) with pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty (PBV) is a viable method to decrease the pressure gradient across the valve. However, to the authors' knowledge, the variables that influence the selection of the correct balloon size for the procedure have not been explored. Moreover, the lesions caused by the procedure have not been detailed. HYPOTHESIS: Variables that influence the measurement of the annulus could affect selection of the balloon size. We sought to determine the effects of treatment when the balloon-to-annulus ratio (BAR) was or > 1.3, but within the recommended range of 1.2-1.5, regardless of whether dilation was performed with single or double balloon technique. ANIMALS: Twenty-five Beagles with PS were studied. METHODS: Inter- and intra-observer variability, echocardiography versus angiocardiography, and systolic versus diastolic timing were evaluated for the BAR. Assessment of right ventricular (RV) pressure, Doppler gradient, stenotic valve area, and RV wall thickness were compared before and 1, 90, and 180 days after treatment. Postmortem examination of the heart was done. RESULTS: Significant correlations existed in measurement of the annulus; however, variation existed that would change balloon size. Improvement in the degree of PS was significant regardless of the BAR or single or double ballooning. In the most severely affected dogs, continued improvement was noted on day 90. Postmortem examination revealed tears in the commissures and the valve leaflets. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors influenced determination of the BAR and a range of 1.2-1.5 was effective without detrimental consequences. Dogs with severe PS had continued decrease in RV pressure 3 months after treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Estrada et al. (2006) studied Pulmonic valve stenosis (n=25). Pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty with balloon-to-annulus ratio 1.2-1.5 was evaluated on Right ventricular pressure, Doppler gradient, stenotic valve area, and right ventricular wall thickness. Pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty using a balloon-to-annulus ratio of 1.2-1.5 significantly improved the degree of pulmonic stenosis in dogs, with continued improvement at 90 days in severe cases.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: