Key result
NOACs linked to ~54% lower left atrial thrombus prevalence versus VKAs in AF/AFl.
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation and flutter increase thromboembolism risk, but the prevalence of left atrial thrombus in relation to oral anticoagulation strategies required assessment.
Does oral anticoagulation strategy affect the prevalence of left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter referred for transesophageal echocardiography?
Observational (n=3,109)
Yes
Does oral anticoagulation strategy affect the prevalence of left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter referred for transesophageal echocardiography?
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 13%
p-value: p=< 0.01
In patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter undergoing transesophageal echocardiography, left atrial thrombus prevalence remains significant even on chronic OAC, with higher rates observed in those taking VKAs compared to NOACs.
NOACs were associated with lower LAT prevalence than VKAs; observational data leaves open whether this should guide anticoagulation choice in AF.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFl) increase the risk of thromboembolism. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of left atrial thrombus (LAT) in AF/AFl in relation to oral anticoagulation (OAC). Methods: LATTEE (NCT03591627) was a multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolling consecutive patients with AF/AFl referred for transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion or ablation. Results: Of 3109 patients enrolled, 88% were on chronic, 1.5% on transient OAC and 10% without OAC. Of patients on chronic OAC, 39% received rivaroxaban, 30% dabigatran, 14% apixaban and 18% vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Patients on apixaban were oldest, had the worst renal function and were highest in both bleeding and thromboembolic risk, and more often received reduced doses. Prevalence of LAT was 8.0% (7.3% on chronic OAC vs. 15% without OAC; p < 0.01). In patients on VKA, prevalence of LAT was doubled compared to patients on non-VKA-OACs (NOACs) (13% vs. 6.0%; p < 0.01), even after propensity score weighting (13% vs. 7.5%; p < 0.01). Prevalence of LAT in patients on apixaban was higher (9.8%) than in those on rivaroxaban (5.7%) and dabigatran (4.7%; p < 0.01 for both comparisons), however, not after propensity score weighting. Conclusions: The prevalence of LAT in AF is non-negligible even on chronic OAC. The risk of LAT seems higher on VKA compared to NOAC, and similar between different NOACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kapłon‐Cieślicka et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation and flutter (n=3,109). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was evaluated on Prevalence of left atrial thrombus (LAT) (p=< 0.01). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower prevalence of left atrial thrombus compared to vitamin K antagonists (6.0% vs. 13%; p < 0.01) in AF/AFl patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: