Key result
Atrial flutter is linked to 0% LAA thrombus prevalence before cardioversion versus atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Patients with AFL receive anticoagulation per AF criteria, but whether AFL carries a similar thromboembolic risk to AF remains unclear.
Does atrial flutter have a lower prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus compared to atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing TEE before cardioversion?
Observational (n=438)
Does atrial flutter have a lower prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus compared to atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing TEE before cardioversion?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 2.8%
p-value: p=<.0001
Patients with atrial flutter have a significantly lower prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus compared to those with atrial fibrillation, suggesting current anticoagulation guidelines for solitary AFL may need re-evaluation.
AFL associated with lower pre-cardioversion LAAT than AF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter anticoagulation guidelines.
Objective: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of thromboembolic events originating mainly from left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT). Patients with atrial flutter (AFL) are treated with anticoagulation based on the same criteria as patients with AF. However, whether patients with AFL have similar thromboembolic risk as AF is unclear. In the current study we aimed to estimate the prevalence of LAAT in patients with AFL undergoing trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE). Methods/results: We included 438 patients (404 with AF and 34 with AFL) scheduled for TEE to rule out LAAT before cardioversion (patients who reported no or inadequate anticoagulation before cardioversion). Demographic and echocardiographic data were compared between patients with and without LAAT. Despite a similar CHA 2 DS 2 -VASC score (3.8 ± 1.3 vs 3.4 ± 1.5 in the AF and AFL groups, respectively, P = .09), LAAT was documented in 12 (2.8%) in the AF group and in no patient in the AFL group ( P < .0001). Conclusion: Based on our results and previous studies, it seems reasonable to re-evaluate the need for oral anticoagulation in specific populations with AFL such as those with solitary AFL (without a history of AF episodes) undergoing successful ablation and in those with low CHA 2 DS 2 -VASC score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moady et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (n=438). Atrial flutter vs. Atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) (p=<.0001). Atrial flutter was associated with a significantly lower prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus compared to atrial fibrillation (0% vs 2.8%; P<0.0001) before cardioversion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: