Key result
Modelflow stroke volume estimates during orthostatic stress match echocardiography within ~15% equivalence.
Why the study?
Modelflow non-invasively estimates beat-to-beat stroke volume, but its accuracy during profound reductions in stroke volume is unclear.
Does Modelflow accurately estimate stroke volume compared to echocardiography during orthostatic stress?
Population
13 individuals (age 24 ± 2 years; 7 female)
Comparison
Stroke volume estimation by Modelflow vs echocardiography
Design
Comparative physiological study
Authors
Loading...
Modelflow may aid orthostatic SV research; leaves open larger validation before clinical adoption.
Cross-Sectional (n=13)
Does Modelflow accurately estimate stroke volume compared to echocardiography during orthostatic stress?
Effect estimate: r = 0.56
Absolute Event Rate: 73.2% vs 66.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Modelflow provides accurate estimates of stroke volume during profound orthostatic stress compared to echocardiography, supporting its use in autonomic function testing.
Lucci et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Orthostatic stress (n=13). Modelflow vs. Echocardiography was evaluated on Stroke volume estimation across all timepoints (r = 0.56, p=<0.001). Modelflow estimates of stroke volume during profound orthostatic stress were strongly correlated with echocardiography (r=0.56, P<0.001) and equivalent to within 15% of the clinical standard.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: