Why the study?
Although inotropic agents in advanced heart failure have been evaluated in several randomized controlled trials, evidence regarding their efficacy and safety remains conflicting.
What is the role and evidence for the use of inotropic agents in advanced heart failure?
What is the role and evidence for the use of inotropic agents in advanced heart failure?
This review reinforces that long-term inotrope use in advanced heart failure should be restricted to palliative or bridging strategies, while short-term use remains essential for cardiogenic shock and severe acute decompensation.
Caution long-term inotrope use in advanced HF to selected palliative or bridge cases; leaves open optimal agent and duration via targeted trials.
BACKGROUND: Use of inotropic agents in advanced heart failure (HF) has over time been evaluated in several randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCTs). However, the evidence for both efficacy and safety is conflicting. SUMMARY: In this narrative review, the evidence for and role of inotropes in advanced HF are outlined. Readers are provided with a comprehensive overview of key-findings from 23 important RCTs comparing orally or intravenously administered inotropes. Clinically relevant pros and cons of inotropic regimens are summarized to guide the clinician in the management of advanced HF patients in different settings (e.g., out-patient, in-patient, and intensive care unit). Finally, future perspectives and potential new agents are discussed. KEY MESSAGES: Long-term use of inotropes in advanced HF is controversial and should only be considered in selected patients (e.g., as palliative or bridging strategy). However, short-term use continues to play a large role in hospitalized patients with cardiogenic shock or severe decompensated acute HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: