Key result
Levosimendan is linked to more clinical worsening than milrinone in acute HF with severe renal dysfunction.
Why the study?
Levosimendan and milrinone are effective inotropes for acute heart failure, but data comparing their effectiveness and safety across different levels of renal function were needed.
Does levosimendan compared to milrinone improve clinical status in patients with acute heart failure with and without renal dysfunction?
Cohort (n=974)
No
Does levosimendan compared to milrinone improve clinical status in patients with acute heart failure with and without renal dysfunction?
p-value: p=< 0.05
In acute heart failure patients with severe renal dysfunction (CrCl <30 mL/min), initial inotrope therapy with levosimendan is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to milrinone and should be avoided.
May favor milrinone over levosimendan in acute HF with severe renal dysfunction; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Levosimendan and milrinone are 2 effective inotropic drugs used to maintain cardiac output in acute heart failure (AHF). Using data from patients with AHF with and without abnormal renal function, we performed this single-center, retrospective cohort study to compare the effectiveness and safety of milrinone and levosimendan for the initial management of AHF. Patients admitted for heart failure between December 2016 and September 2019 who received levosimendan or milrinone as initial inotrope therapy in the cardiology department were identified. A total of 436 levosimendan and 417 milrinone patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥30 mL/min and 50 levosimendan and 71 milrinone patients with CrCl <30 mL/min or on dialysis were included. The primary outcome was a composite of changes in clinical status at 15 and 30 days after initial inotrope therapy discontinuation. Between subgroups of patients with CrCl ≥30 mL/min, there were no significant differences in primary outcomes; milrinone was associated with more frequent hypotension and cardiac arrhythmias during the infusion period (P < 0.01), while levosimendan was associated with more frequent cardiac arrhythmias within 48 hours after discontinuation (P < 0.05). Of the patients with CrCl <30 mL/min or on dialysis, more initial levosimendan than milrinone patients and those who switched to alternative inotropes experienced clinical worsening at 15 days and 30 days (P < 0.05). According to our results, patients with AHF with severe renal dysfunction should avoid initial inotrope therapy with levosimendan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure (n=974). Levosimendan vs. Milrinone was evaluated on Composite of changes in clinical status at 15 and 30 days after initial inotrope therapy discontinuation (p=< 0.05). In acute heart failure patients with severe renal dysfunction, initial therapy with levosimendan resulted in more frequent clinical worsening at 15 and 30 days compared to milrinone (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: