Key result
High running performance rats had a 3.5-fold greater running capacity than low running performance rats, with 29 cardiac proteomic differences identified between the groups.
Why the study?
Are there cardiac proteomic differences between non-selectively bred rats with distinct intrinsic exercise capacities?
Are there cardiac proteomic differences between non-selectively bred rats with distinct intrinsic exercise capacities?
Intrinsic high exercise capacity in rats is associated with upregulated cardiac contractile proteins, whereas low capacity is associated with stress response proteins linked to cardiovascular disease risk.
Rat cardiac proteomes differ by intrinsic exercise capacity; hypothesis-generating for human fitness-CVD links, pending validation.
In the present study, we successfully demonstrated for the first time the existence of cardiac proteomic differences between non-selectively bred rats with distinct intrinsic exercise capacities. A proteomic approach based on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry was used to study the left ventricle (LV) tissue proteome of rats with distinct intrinsic exercise capacity. Low running performance (LRP) and high running performance (HRP) rats were categorized by a treadmill exercise test, according to distance run to exhaustion. The running capacity of HRPs was 3.5-fold greater than LRPs. Protein profiling revealed 29 differences between HRP and LRP rats (15 proteins were identified). We detected alterations in components involved in metabolism, antioxidant and stress response, microfibrillar and cytoskeletal proteins. Contractile proteins were upregulated in the LVs of HRP rats (α-myosin heavy chain-6, myosin light chain-1 and creatine kinase), whereas the LVs of LRP rats exhibited upregulation in proteins associated with stress response (aldehyde dehydrogenase 2, α-crystallin B chain and HSPβ-2). In addition, the cytoskeletal proteins desmin and α-actin were upregulated in LRPs. Taken together, our results suggest that the increased contractile protein levels in HRP rats partly accounted for their improved exercise capacity, and that proteins considered risk factors to the development of cardiovascular disease were expressed in higher amounts in LRP animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ribeiro et al. (2018) studied Intrinsic exercise capacity. High running performance (HRP) vs. Low running performance (LRP) was evaluated on Cardiac proteomic differences in the left ventricle. High running performance rats had a 3.5-fold greater running capacity than low running performance rats, with 29 cardiac proteomic differences identified between the groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: