Key result
Review outlines cardiomyocyte mitochondrial adaptations to mechanical stimuli and MCS in ischemic heart disease.
Understanding mitochondrial metabolic adaptations in ischemic heart disease provides potential therapeutic targets for preventing progression to heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Identifies mitochondrial targets for ischemic remodeling research; leaves open clinical effects of mechanical support on energy metabolism.
Ischemic heart disease refers to myocardial degeneration, necrosis, and fibrosis caused by coronary artery disease. It can lead to severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 35-40%) and is a major cause of heart failure (HF). In each contraction, myocardium is subjected to a variety of mechanical forces, such as stretch, afterload, and shear stress, and these mechanical stresses are clinically associated with myocardial remodeling and, eventually, cardiac outcomes. Mitochondria produce 90% of ATP in the heart and participate in metabolic pathways that regulate the balance of glucose and fatty acid oxidative phosphorylation. However, altered energetics and metabolic reprogramming are proved to aggravate HF development and progression by disturbing substrate utilization. This review briefly summarizes the current insights into the adaptations of cardiomyocytes to mechanical stimuli and underlying mechanisms in ischemic heart disease, with focusing on mitochondrial metabolism. We also discuss how mechanical circulatory support (MCS) alters myocardial energy metabolism and affects the detrimental metabolic adaptations of the dysfunctional myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2021) conducted a review in Ischemic heart disease. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was evaluated. This review summarizes current insights into cardiomyocyte adaptations to mechanical stimuli in ischemic heart disease, focusing on mitochondrial metabolism and the effects of mechanical circulatory support.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: