Why the study?
Around 50% of heart failure readmissions are preventable with lack of self-care adherence as a driving factor, and remote tracking via mobile health devices may help promote self-care.
Is a remote monitoring regimen using wireless sensors and patient-reported outcome measures feasible and adhered to by hospitalized heart failure patients?
Is a remote monitoring regimen using wireless sensors and patient-reported outcome measures feasible and adhered to by hospitalized heart failure patients?
A remote monitoring pilot in heart failure patients demonstrated high adherence for activity trackers but low adherence for smart pill bottles and surveys, alongside low overall enrollment feasibility prior to discharge.
Variable adherence limits remote monitoring feasibility in hospitalized HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Around 50% of hospital readmissions due to heart failure are preventable, with lack of adherence to prescribed self-care as a driving factor. Remote tracking and reminders issued by mobile health devices could help to promote self-care, which could potentially reduce these readmissions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate two factors: (1) feasibility of enrolling heart failure patients in a remote monitoring regimen that uses wireless sensors and patient-reported outcome measures; and (2) their adherence to using the study devices and completing patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS: Twenty heart failure patients participated in piloting a remote monitoring regimen. Data collection included: (1) physical activity using wrist-worn activity trackers; (2) body weight using bathroom scales; (3) medication adherence using smart pill bottles; and (4) patient -reported outcomes using patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: We evaluated 150 hospitalized heart failure patients and enrolled 20 individuals. Two factors contributed to 50% (65/130) being excluded from the study: smartphone ownership and patient discharge. Over the course of the study, 60.0% of the subjects wore the activity tracker for at least 70% of the hours, and 45.0% used the scale for more than 70% of the days. The pill bottle was used less than 10% of the days by 55.0% of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our method of recruiting heart failure patients prior to hospital discharge may not be feasible as the enrollment rate was low. Once enrolled, the majority of subjects maintained a high adherence to wearing the activity tracker but low adherence to using the pill bottle and completing the follow-up surveys. Scale usage was fair, but it received positive reviews from most subjects. Given the observed usage and feedback, we suggest mobile health-driven interventions consider including an activity tracker and bathroom scale. We also recommend administering a shorter survey more regularly and through an easier interface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sohn et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: