Retrospective analysis evaluates biopsy methods for detecting prostate cancer in high-grade lesions, indicating alternative strategies may reduce unnecessary procedures.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the additional diagnostic value of systematic (SBx) and perilesional biopsies (PBx) compared with targeted biopsy (TBx) in patients with mpMRI-detected PI-RADS 3-4–5 lesions. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 208 men with PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions who underwent mpMRI–ultrasound fusion biopsy at a single institution. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; ISUP ≥ 2) was identified in 155 patients (74.5%), who constituted the study cohort. All patients underwent a standardized biopsy protocol consisting of 3–5 TBx cores, 3 PBx cores sampled within a 10 mm radius of the index lesion, and 10 SBx cores using the KOELIS Trinity® system. Detection rates of csPCa and ISUP grade upgrading were analyzed and stratified by PI-RADS category. Results: TBx csPCa detection rates increased progressively with PI-RADS score: 39% for PI-RADS 3, 50% for PI-RADS 4, and 60% for PI-RADS 5 lesions. PBx showed a 42.5% detection rate of csPCa in PI-RADS 3 and 58% and 85.3% of csPCa in PI-RADS 4 and 5 respectively, whereas SBx detected 34.5% of csPCa in PI-RADS 3, 46% of csPCa in PI-RADS 4, and 60.5% of csPCa in PI-RADS 5. Despite these detection rates, PBx and SBx rarely provided clinically meaningful upgrading over TBx findings. ISUP grade upgrading occurred in only 7.3% of PBx cases and 1.8% of SBx cases in PI-RADS 5 lesions, with similarly low upgrading rates observed in PI-RADS 3–4 lesions. Conclusions: In patients with high-grade lesions like PI-RADS 4–5, TBx alone identifies the vast majority of csPCa, while SBx and PBx contribute minimal additional diagnostic or grading benefit. These findings support biopsy de-escalation strategies in high-risk mpMRI settings to reduce unnecessary sampling and procedure-related morbidity. On the other hand, in the PI-RADS 3 subgroup, omitting non-targeted sampling (SBx and/or PBx) may lead to underdiagnosis of higher-grade tumors not captured by TBx alone, potentially resulting in substantial changes in therapeutic strategy and, consequently, patient prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scarrone et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: