Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing medication efficacy for fatigue in MS, suggesting specific improvements.
BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a disabling symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) with an unknown etiology. Various medications are used to treat MS-related fatigue, but none of the available studies directly compared the head-to-head efficacy of all these medications. So, we designed this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of these drugs in treating MS-related fatigue. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were thoroughly searched by two independent researchers on 1 March 2025. Mean difference (SMD) was used as the effect size, and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was applied to rank interventions. RESULTS: 15 studies were ultimately included in the systematic review. For fatigue severity, none of the medications were superior to placebo. For fatigue impact (MFIS) compared with placebo, Amantadine (MD -12.11, 95% CI -14.28 to -9.94), Dalfampridine (MD -14.05, 95% CI -22.59 to -5.52, and Methylphenidate (MD -5.25, 95% CI -8.44 to -2.06) were associated with statistically significant improvements. In contrast, CBT (MD 1.40, 95% CI -1.99 to 4.80), and Modafinil (MD 0.60, 95% CI -1.26 to 2.46) did not differ significantly from placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Amantadine, dalfampridine, and methylphenidate were found to be superior to placebo in improving the impact of fatigue on patients' lives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rastkar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: