Key result
Hypoxia, lipid-handling, and ECM genes drive acute repair and chronic maladaptation in MI and HF.
Why the study?
Heart failure and myocardial infarction share overlapping pathogenic pathways, and understanding the integrated roles of hypoxia-response, lipid-handling, and extracellular matrix genes can uncover biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Systematic Review
This systematic review highlights the integrated roles of hypoxia, lipid metabolism, and extracellular matrix remodeling genes in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction and heart failure, identifying potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
May refine HF/MI risk stratification via integrated gene profiling; extends pathway models toward clinical biomarker validation.
Heart failure (HF) and myocardial infarction (MI) are interconnected syndromes with overlapping pathogenic pathways, including ischemia, neurohormonal activation, and maladaptive remodeling. Hypoxia-response genes, lipid-handling genes, and extracellular matrix (ECM) genes each influence these processes. Understanding their integrated roles can uncover biomarkers and targets. A systematic literature search was conducted (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus; 2000–2026; English-only, following PRISMA guidelines) to identify studies on key genes in hypoxia signaling, lipid metabolism, and ECM remodeling in MI/HF. Acute hypoxia (via HIFs) orchestrates metabolic adaptation and inflammation, but chronic HIF activation drives fibrosis and dysfunction. In parallel, genes controlling triglyceride and cholesterol handling (e.g., LPL, APOC3) influence energy supply and vascular risk. Variants in these genes modulate plasma lipids and MI/HF risk. For example, genetic loss-of-function in APOC3 lowers triglycerides and reduces coronary risk. ECM-related genes (e.g., COL4A1, LRP1) govern fibrosis and vascular integrity. Mutations in COL4A1 cause cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and severe fibrosis, while LRP1 regulates matrix remodeling and is upregulated in ischemic myocardium. Throughout, gene functions span acute repair versus chronic maladaptation. Findings derive from mixed sources: rodent models and cell studies demonstrate mechanistic links, while human genetics and cohorts link gene variants to HF/MI outcomes. Many promising biomarkers (e.g., circulating ITGA1) are preliminary, lacking large prospective validation. Not all cited therapeutic ideas have been tested in the treatment of human cardiac disease. The literature mix of species, models, and patient cohorts introduces heterogeneity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Celiński et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure. Hypoxia signaling, lipid-handling, and extracellular matrix remodeling genes play integrated roles in myocardial infarction and heart failure, driving both acute repair and chronic maladaptation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: