Key result
Nonfatal hospitalization in chronic HF is not linked to significant changes in EQ-5D utility scores.
Why the study?
Empirical identification of the direct impact of hospitalisation on utility changes was needed to help interpret unexplained quality of life variance and inform economic evaluations.
Does nonfatal hospitalisation impact health-related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure?
Population
Patients diagnosed with heart failure with utility records before and after hospitalisation
Comparison
Quality of life pre- vs post-hospitalisation
Design
Cohort study
Authors
Loading...
Nonfatal HF hospitalization was not linked to meaningful EQ-5D change; cohort data leave open cause-specific effects and need prospective validation.
Cohort (n=270)
Yes
Does nonfatal hospitalisation impact health-related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure?
Effect estimate: Mean difference 0.020 (95% CI -0.020, 0.059)
Hospitalisation in patients with chronic heart failure does not result in a significant overall change in health-related quality of life when measured before and after the event, though variations exist based on the primary cause of admission.
Almeida et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Chronic heart failure (n=270). Hospitalisation vs. Pre-hospitalisation baseline was evaluated on Difference in EQ-5D index utility pre and post hospitalisation (Mean difference 0.020, 95% CI -0.020, 0.059). Nonfatal hospitalisation in patients with chronic heart failure was associated with a non-significant mean difference in EQ-5D index utility of 0.020 between pre- and post-hospitalisation measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: