Key result
Long-term prophylactic anticoagulant therapy after acute myocardial infarction did not reduce mortality or complications over an average of 6 years, but increased hospitalizations.
Why the study?
Does long-term prophylactic anticoagulant therapy reduce mortality or complications in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
RCT
Double-blind
randomized
Does long-term prophylactic anticoagulant therapy reduce mortality or complications in patients after acute myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Long-term prophylactic anticoagulant therapy after acute myocardial infarction does not improve survival and may increase hospitalizations.
In a double-blind, randomized test, long-term prophylactic anticoagulant therapy after acute myocardial infarction did not reduce mortality rate or complications. More treated patients required hospitalization than patients not receiving anticoagulant drugs. Patients continuously entered the study between 1956 and 1967. The average period at risk was about six years. All patients received six weeks of anticoagulant therapy for initial episodes of infarction, and, time and circumstances permitting, for recurrent myocardial infarctions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seaman et al. (1969) conducted an RCT in acute myocardial infarction. long-term prophylactic anticoagulant therapy vs. not receiving anticoagulant drugs was evaluated on mortality rate or complications. Long-term prophylactic anticoagulant therapy after acute myocardial infarction did not reduce mortality or complications over an average of 6 years, but increased hospitalizations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: