Key result
Long-term anticoagulant therapy demonstrated no significant benefit in preventing recurrences of myocardial infarction when rigorous experimental designs, such as double-blind placebo techniques, were used.
Why the study?
Does long-term anticoagulant therapy prevent recurrences of myocardial infarction in patients with prior MI?
Does long-term anticoagulant therapy prevent recurrences of myocardial infarction in patients with prior MI?
This letter argues that the perceived benefits of long-term anticoagulant therapy for preventing recurrent MI disappear when rigorous double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designs are employed.
To the Editor: When the many published reports on the efficacy of long-term anticoagulant therapy in preventing recurrences of myocardial infarction are studied, one cannot fail but to be impressed by a curious phenomenon: that as experimental design has become more and more rigorous, the documentation of the benefits derived from this particular form of therapy have become more and more difficult as the differences between control and treated patients tend to vanish Thus, in Bjerklund's study and in the British Medical Research Council Study, the probability value for successful therapy in males of the most favorable category (selected by age) calculates to be about 0.1 (at times, slightly less, but never at the 0.05 level). When control of observer bias is added as well to the experimental design, as was done by Seaman and by our group using the double-blind placebo technique, no benefit from anticoagulant therapy was demonstrated
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loyal L. Conrad (1966) conducted a letter in Myocardial infarction. Long-term anticoagulant therapy vs. Control/Placebo was evaluated on Recurrences of myocardial infarction (p=0.1). Long-term anticoagulant therapy demonstrated no significant benefit in preventing recurrences of myocardial infarction when rigorous experimental designs, such as double-blind placebo techniques, were used.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: