Key result
Integrated specialized AF clinics reduce all-cause mortality ~56% versus usual care.
Why the study?
Although integrated specialized outpatient AF clinics have improved clinical outcomes, their impact on all-cause mortality required dedicated assessment.
Does an integrated specialized AF-Clinic reduce all-cause mortality in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=712)
Open Blinded Endpoint
Randomized
No
Does an integrated specialized AF-Clinic reduce all-cause mortality in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: HR 0.44 (95% CI 0.23-0.85)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.7% vs 8.1%
p-value: p=0.014
Nurse-driven, physician-supervised integrated care clinics for newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation significantly reduce all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to usual cardiologist care.
Supports integrated AF clinics in practice to lower mortality; extends RCT evidence for structured care models in newly diagnosed patients.
AIMS: An integrated chronic care programme in terms of a specialized outpatient clinic for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess all-cause mortality in patients in whom AF management was delivered through a specialized outpatient clinic offering an integrated chronic care programme. METHODS AND RESULTS: Post hoc analysis of a Prospective Randomized Open Blinded Endpoint Clinical trial to assess all-cause mortality in AF patients. The study included 712 patients with newly diagnosed AF, who were referred for AF management to the outpatient service of a University hospital. In the specialized outpatient clinic (AF-Clinic), comprehensive, multidisciplinary, and patient-centred AF care was provided, i.e. nurse-driven, physician supervised AF treatment guided by software based on the latest guidelines. The control group received usual care by a cardiologist in the regular outpatient setting.After a mean follow-up of 22 months, all-cause mortality amounted 3.7% (13 patients) in the AF-Clinic arm and 8.1% (29 patients) in usual care [hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-0.85; P = 0.014]. This included cardiovascular mortality in 4 AF-Clinic patients (1.1%) and 14 patients (3.9%) in usual care (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.85; P = 0.025). Further, 9 patients (2.5%) died in the AF-Clinic arm due to a non-cardiovascular reason and 15 patients (4.2%) in the usual care arm (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.26-1.34; P = 0.206). CONCLUSION: An integrated specialized AF-Clinic reduces all-cause mortality compared with usual care. These findings provide compelling evidence that an integrated approach should be widely implemented in AF management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hendriks et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=712). Integrated specialized AF-Clinic vs. Usual care was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.85, p=0.014). An integrated specialized AF-Clinic reduced all-cause mortality compared with usual care (3.7% vs 8.1%; HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23-0.85; P=0.014).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: