Key result
Multidisciplinary care in a dedicated outpatient clinic did not significantly change total AF-related costs compared to physician-led usual care (€3154 vs €2746).
Why the study?
Healthcare utilization costs of a dedicated outpatient clinic for patients with atrial fibrillation needed assessment.
Does multidisciplinary care reduce total costs of AF-related resource utilization in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=1,552)
Does multidisciplinary care reduce total costs of AF-related resource utilization in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 3154% vs 2746%
p-value: p=not statistically significant
A dedicated multidisciplinary outpatient clinic for newly diagnosed AF did not significantly change total AF-related costs but significantly reduced outpatient costs.
Multidisciplinary AF care did not reduce total costs; leaves open whether outpatient savings justify dedicated clinics in new AF patients.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess healthcare utilization costs of a dedicated outpatient clinic for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We conducted a registry-based retrospective study in patients with a first-time AF diagnosis from 2009 to 2011 (control group) and 2013 to 2015 (intervention group). The control group had physician-led usual care, and the intervention group received multidisciplinary care. The primary outcome was total costs of AF-related resource utilization. Exploratory outcomes were ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality. Multiple regression methods were used to control for confounders in the assessment of effects on outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1552 patients were included, hereof 850 in the intervention group. Total AF-related costs were €2746 for the control group and €3154 for the intervention group, which was not statistically significant. Average outpatient costs were significantly higher in the control group than in the intervention group (€522 vs €344, respectively; P = .003). There was no difference in the number of AF-related hospital admissions and outpatient visits between the control group and the intervention group (incidence risk ratio, 1.03 vs 0.85; and 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.16 vs 0.69-1.05, respectively). There was a trend toward reduced all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.16) in the intervention group, which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Total expenses for AF-related hospital resource utilization in the intervention group were higher, but the expenses for AF-related outpatient visits were significantly lower. There was a trend toward lower all-cause mortality in the intervention group, although the differences were not statistically significant. More research is needed investigating whether a multidisciplinary AF clinic is cost-effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thrysoee et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,552). Multidisciplinary care in a dedicated outpatient clinic vs. Physician-led usual care was evaluated on Total costs of AF-related resource utilization (p=not statistically significant). Multidisciplinary care in a dedicated outpatient clinic did not significantly change total AF-related costs compared to physician-led usual care (€3154 vs €2746).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: