Key result
Shorter systolic distance between Impella inflow and LV is linked to higher adverse event risk.
Why the study?
Impella-related adverse events occur in over 30% of patients, and it was hypothesized that the position of the Impella inflow part may influence these events.
Does a short distance between the inflow part of Impella 5.0 or 5.5 and the left ventricular structure increase the risk of Impella-related adverse events?
Observational (n=87)
No
Does a short distance between the inflow part of Impella 5.0 or 5.5 and the left ventricular structure increase the risk of Impella-related adverse events?
A short distance between the inflow part of Impella 5.0 or 5.5 and the left ventricular structure is a significant risk factor for device-related adverse events such as bleeding, stroke, and hemolysis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shorter inflow-LV distance was associated with more Impella adverse events; hypothesis-generating for positioning thresholds in prospective trials.
Impella-related adverse events, such as stroke, major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and hemolysis, occur in more than 30% of patients. Some studies have reported the importance of Impella positioning in preventing Impella-related adverse events. We considered that the position of the inflow part of Impella may influence the occurrence of adverse events. Impella 5.0 or 5.5 management was performed for 87 patients at Osaka University Hospital between October 2017 and November 2023. Impella-related adverse events occurred in 36 patients. The rates of freedom from Impella-related adverse events at 10, 20, and 30 days were 60, 49, and 39%, respectively. Bleeding events, stroke events, and hemolysis occurred in 20, 12, and 6 patients, respectively. The distances between the inflow part and left ventricular structure at systole and diastole in the patients with Impella-related adverse events were shorter than those in the patients without Impella-related adverse events (systole: 2 ± 2 vs. 8 ± 7 mm, p < 0.01; diastole: 4 ± 3 vs. 11 ± 7 mm, p < 0.01). A short distance between the inflow and left ventricular structure is a risk factor for Impella-related adverse events. It may be important that the inflow part of Impella 5.0 or 5.5 is not close to the left ventricular structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imaoka et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Patients requiring Impella 5.0 or 5.5 support (n=87). Impella 5.0 or 5.5 was evaluated on Impella-related adverse events (stroke, major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and hemolysis) (p=<0.01). A shorter distance between the Impella 5.0 or 5.5 inflow part and the left ventricular structure at systole was associated with a higher risk of adverse events (2 ± 2 vs. 8 ± 7 mm, p < 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: