Why the study?
Acute myocardial infarction remains a global health challenge, driving innovation toward precision medicine and regenerative therapies.
This review highlights the transition from traditional reperfusion strategies to precision and regenerative medicine in the management of acute myocardial infarction.
Supports further study of precision approaches in AMI; leaves open whether they improve outcomes before clinical adoption.
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a global health challenge. This has driven innovation toward precision medicine, including major advances in several key areas. Precision Reperfusion: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) can be used to optimize stent deployment, thereby reducing thrombosis and restenosis. Bioabsorbable stents and drug-coated balloons (DCBs) show promise in minimizing long-term complications. Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS): Early use of Impella and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been shown to improve survival in select AMI-cardiogenic shock patients, although device selection and timing require further validation. Antiplatelet Personalization: Genotyping (e.g., CYP2C19) and testing of platelet function enables tailored dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), thus balancing ischemic and bleeding risks. Regenerative Therapies: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) from stem cells or cardiac progenitors have shown cardioprotective effects in preclinical models, addressing limitations of cell-based approaches. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven platforms can optimize EV delivery and tissue repair. AI-Enhanced Diagnostics: Machine learning models improve Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation, risk stratification, and the detection of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This review aims to provide a theoretical foundation for practical clinical applications in the treatment of AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: