Key result
Telemonitoring during office hours (HR 0.76) and human-to-human structured telephone support (HR 0.77) showed statistically inconclusive reductions in all-cause mortality compared to usual care.
Why the study?
Does remote monitoring (telemonitoring or structured telephone support) reduce mortality and hospitalizations in adult patients recently discharged after a heart failure exacerbation?
Population
Adults with a heart failure diagnosis who have been recently discharged from acute care after a recent…
Comparison
Remote monitoring interventions including… vs Usual care.
Design
Meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Telemonitoring during office hours may be cost-effective despite inconclusive mortality benefit; extends evidence with network meta-analysis and economic modeling in post-discharge HF.
Systematic Review
Does remote monitoring (telemonitoring or structured telephone support) reduce mortality and hospitalizations in adult patients recently discharged after a heart failure exacerbation?
Effect estimate: HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.49-1.18)
Telemonitoring during office hours is a cost-effective strategy for patients recently discharged after a heart failure exacerbation, though clinical effectiveness results showed wide credible intervals.
Pandor et al. (2013) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure. Home telemonitoring or structured telephone support vs. Usual care was evaluated on All-cause mortality (telemonitoring during office hours vs usual care) (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.49-1.18). Telemonitoring during office hours (HR 0.76) and human-to-human structured telephone support (HR 0.77) showed statistically inconclusive reductions in all-cause mortality compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: