Key result
Quantitative minimum luminal area highly correlates with IVUS in intermediate coronary lesions.
Why the study?
Advances in technology have improved CCS management, but the correlation and agreement between IVUSMLA and QMLA in CCS patients with intermediate coronary lesions required investigation.
Does quantitative minimum luminal area (QMLA) correlate and agree with intravascular ultrasound minimum luminal area (IVUSMLA) in patients with intermediate coronary lesions?
Observational (n=88)
Single-blind
No
Does quantitative minimum luminal area (QMLA) correlate and agree with intravascular ultrasound minimum luminal area (IVUSMLA) in patients with intermediate coronary lesions?
Effect estimate: r = 0.997
Absolute Event Rate: 2.6% vs 2.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
QMLA is highly correlated with IVUSMLA in intermediate coronary lesions, suggesting it may be a viable alternative for assessing stenosis severity.
BACKGROUND: Chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is a common disease worldwide. Advances in technology, including quantitative coronary angiography, have improved CCS management. In the present study, we aim to investigate the correlation and agreement between intravascular ultrasound minimum luminal area (IVUSMLA) and quantitative minimum luminal area (QMLA) in CCS patients with intermediate coronary lesions. METHODS: Data from CCS patients with at least one-vessel coronary occlusion from March 2022 to March 2023 were collected. Gathered data included patients' age, gender, QMLA, IVUSMLA, and patients' previous medical history, including hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. The target lesion in this study was intermediate (50% to 70%) stenosis. Agreement between IVUSMLA and QMLA was assessed using the Bland-Altman plot. A p-value (p) of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. R version 4.4.1 software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used for data analysis. RESULTS: This study included 52 (59.1%) men and 36 (40.9%) women with a mean age of 67.15 ± 10.63 and 64 ± 12.61 (p = 0.533), respectively. The mean for IVUSMLA and QMLA was 2.80 ± 1.54 and 2.6 ± 1.57, respectively. QMLA was highly correlated with IVUSMLA (r = 0.997; p <0.001). Both QMLA and IVUSMLA had moderately good agreement, presenting with small mean difference values but large values of root mean squared deviation (IVUSMLA - QMLA = 0.13 ± 0.11). CONCLUSION: IVUSMLA and QMLA are highly correlated to each other and have good agreement. So, QMLA can be used instead of IVUSMLA in intermediate coronary lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammadi et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Chronic coronary syndrome with intermediate coronary lesions (n=88). Quantitative minimum luminal area (QMLA) vs. Intravascular ultrasound minimum luminal area (IVUSMLA) was evaluated on Correlation between QMLA and IVUSMLA (r = 0.997, p=<0.001). Quantitative minimum luminal area was highly correlated with intravascular ultrasound minimum luminal area (r = 0.997, p < 0.001) and demonstrated good agreement in intermediate coronary lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: