Why the study?
Does videodensitometric quantitative angiography correlate better with intracoronary ultrasound than edge-detection angiography for measuring minimal luminal cross-sectional area after coronary interventions?
Population
150 patients who underwent successful balloon angioplasty (n=100) or directional atherectomy (n=50)
Comparison
Videodensitometric quantitative angiography and… vs Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS)
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
VID may improve postintervention luminal assessment accuracy versus ED in complex lesions; leaves open need for outcome trials before changing practice.
Does videodensitometric quantitative angiography correlate better with intracoronary ultrasound than edge-detection angiography for measuring minimal luminal cross-sectional area after coronary interventions?
Videodensitometric quantitative angiography shows better agreement with intracoronary ultrasound than edge-detection angiography in assessing complex coronary lesions after angioplasty or atherectomy.
Ozaki et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: