Key result
Late gadolinium enhancement strongly correlates with delayed diastolic volume recovery in HCM.
Why the study?
Does the presence of late gadolinium enhancement correlate with impaired diastolic volume recovery in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=24)
No
Does the presence of late gadolinium enhancement correlate with impaired diastolic volume recovery in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.28% vs 0.19%
p-value: p=0.011
Late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI correlates strongly with diastolic volume recovery parameters, suggesting it may serve as a marker for the effect of myocardial scar on diastolic function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
May link scar to diastolic impairment in HCM; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on the diastolic volume recovery of left ventricle in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: Twenty-four HCM patients were studied through report-card 4.0. The presence or absence of late gadolinium enhancement was recorded according to a standardized methodology with a threshold value of six standard deviations above background. The LGE positive and negative groups were correlated to left ventricular end diastolic volume index (EDVI), left ventricular mass, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), peak filling rate (PFR), peak ejecting rate (PER), normalized peak filling or ejecting rate (NPFR or NPER), time to peak filling or ejecting rate (TPFR or TPER), and diastolic volume recovery (DVR). RESULTS: PFR, NPFR, SV, SVI, EF, CO, CI, FS in LGE positive group were lower than LGE negative group, DVR10-40, DVR100, end systolic volume (ESV), end systolic volume index (ESVI), ESD were higher in LGE positive group, and the differences were statistically significant. The average LGE mass (ROI, region of interest) was 20.78 g, about 13.67% of left ventricle mass in LGE positive HCM group. Pearson correlation was noted between the LGE percent (ROI%) and ESV (0.692, P<0.05), ROI% and EF (-0.718, P<0.05), ROI% and PFR (-0.534, P<0.05), DVR20-40 (0.547, 0.544, 0.906, P<0.05) etc. The correlation between ROI% and DVR40 was best (0.906, P<0.05), and the correlation between ROI% and ESVI, ROI% and EF were both bigger than 0.7, showed the correlation was good. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to common quotas used to assess the structure and function of left ventricle in HCM, volume-time curve parameters may have potential to evaluate cardiac function in HCM. The correlation between DVR generated from volume-time curve with LGE was good, and may be a marker of effect of enhancement/scar tissue on diastolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=24). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) positive vs. LGE negative was evaluated on Diastolic volume recovery at 40% (DVR40) (p=0.011). In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, late gadolinium enhancement was associated with delayed diastolic volume recovery (DVR40 0.28 vs 0.19, p=0.011) and correlated with DVR40 (r=0.906).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: