Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ABSTRACTRestaurant operators adapted their business practices and concepts during the COVID-19. The aim of this research is to identify the transformation of key components of independent restaurant business models. We used a reference framework comprising three key variables—Process, People and Profit—used to distinguish the influence of fast failure concept and the necessary adaptation of the traditional revenue model. The impact of this crisis on their business models and the decisions on which some practices are grounded have allowed us to review traditional processes and assess their relevance. This research is based on 10 interviews with restaurant operators located in various regions of Québec (Canada). The results show that, in this period of insecurity shared by customers and restaurant operators, processes were the components most affected by this upheaval. These processes were characterized by sharing of responsibilities among team members, speed of deployment of tests, and the importance of three elements: partners with multidisciplinary skills, stakeholders, and financial performance centered on profit margins instead of the usual volume aspect. Organic adaptation centered on experimentation and mutual adjustment of resources are what characterized an emergent form of business model in the restaurant industry.KEYWORDS: COVID-19business modelpivotindependent restaurant AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank Jean-Charles Marin, PhD, Alain Girard, PhD, both professors at ITHQ and Ivan Luciano Avaca, Research Advisor Senior Directorate of Academic Studies and Research at ITHQ, whose sharp advice allowed us to strengthen the structure of the article and to criticize our reflections to refine the study’s contribution. We would like to thank, all the business managers who participated in this study. Also, special thanks to Institute (ITHQ) and CRSH for allowing resources for this research. For further information, please correspond with the authors at robert.laporte@ithq.qc.caDisclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. See Appendix 1 – Coding Table2. See Appendix 2 – Certificat d’approbation éthique.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada(SSHRC).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LaPorte et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: