Why the study?
Despite reducing CVD events and death in SPRINT, intensive systolic blood pressure goals have not been adopted in the United States.
Does intensive BP control or team-based care prevent CVD events compared to usual care targeting BP <140/90 mm Hg in SPRINT-eligible US adults?
Does intensive BP control or team-based care prevent CVD events compared to usual care targeting BP <140/90 mm Hg in SPRINT-eligible US adults?
Adding team-based care to usual care targeting BP <130/80 mm Hg may be a pragmatic strategy to prevent CVD events while balancing treatment-related adverse events in SPRINT-eligible adults.
Intensive or team-based BP strategies may prevent substantial CVD events in eligible adults; extends SPRINT to national projections reinforcing <130/80 mm Hg targets.
BACKGROUND: Despite reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and death in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), intensive systolic blood pressure goals have not been adopted in the United States. This study aimed to simulate the potential long-term impact of 4 hypertension management strategies in SPRINT-eligible US adults. METHODS AND RESULTS: The validated Blood Pressure Control-Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model, a discrete event simulation of hypertension care processes (ie, visit frequency, blood pressure [BP] measurement accuracy, medication intensification, and medication adherence) and CVD outcomes, was populated with 25 000 SPRINT-eligible US adults. Four hypertension management strategies were simulated: (1) usual care targeting BP <140/90 mm Hg (Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure usual care), (2) intensive care per the SPRINT protocol targeting BP <120/90 mm Hg (SPRINT intensive), (3) usual care targeting guideline-recommended BP <130/80 mm Hg (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association usual care), and (4) team-based care added to usual care and targeting BP <130/80 mm Hg. Relative to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure usual care, among the 18.1 million SPRINT-eligible US adults, an estimated 138 100 total CVD events could be prevented per year with SPRINT intensive, 33 900 with American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association usual care, and 89 100 with team-based care. Compared with the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure usual care, SPRINT intensive care was projected to increase treatment-related serious adverse events by 77 600 per year, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association usual care by 33 300, and team-based care by 27 200. CONCLUSIONS: As BP control has declined in recent years, health systems must prioritize hypertension management and invest in effective strategies. Adding team-based care to usual care may be a pragmatic way to manage risk in this high-CVD-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied Hypertension (n=25,000). SPRINT intensive care, ACC/AHA usual care, or team-based care vs. JNC7 usual care (BP <140/90 mm Hg) was evaluated on Total CVD events prevented per year. Compared with usual care targeting BP <140/90 mm Hg, SPRINT intensive care could prevent 138,100 CVD events per year, and team-based care could prevent 89,100 events per year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: