Key result
Early recruited coronary collaterals predict ~324% greater likelihood of myocardial viability in late presentation MI.
Why the study?
Previous studies showed conflicting results on coronary collateral circulation in myocardial infarction, likely influenced by early reperfusion, leaving its true impact in nonreperfused patients unclear.
Does the presence of early recruited coronary collaterals preserve myocardial viability in patients with late presentation myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=167)
Does the presence of early recruited coronary collaterals preserve myocardial viability in patients with late presentation myocardial infarction?
In patients with late presentation myocardial infarction and complete coronary occlusion, early recruited coronary collaterals independently predict preserved myocardial viability and better left ventricular functional recovery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early recruited collaterals may aid viability stratification in late MI; extends observational data but leaves causal role open for trials.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed conflicting results regarding the contribution of coronary collateral circulation (CCC) to myocardial perfusion and function in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI). In the primary angioplasty era, the role of CCC in these studies may have been influenced by the effect of early reperfusion. The true impact of CCC could be clarified by studying its effect on nonreperfused patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of CCC on myocardial viability of late presentation MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2019, we included 167 patients with a late presentation MI who had a complete angiographic occlusion in a major coronary artery in which myocardial viability of the culprit territory was assessed. Patients were divided according to the presence of angiographic early recruited CCC (ERCC) (Rentrop 2-3) or poor CCC (PCC) (Rentrop 0-1). A lower left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) at discharge (54.2 ± 9 vs. 47.9 ± 12; <0.01) and a more severe left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in the culprit territory were observed in PCC patients. The presence of ERCC was the main independent predictor of myocardial viability in late presentation MI (hazard ratio, 4.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-10.6; P < 0.001). At follow-up, wall motion score increased significantly (2.05 ± 0.16; P = 0.02) in patients with ERCC but not in PCC patients (0.07 ± 0.16; P = 0.4), and LVEF improvement was significantly higher in ERCC than in PCC patients (9.7 ± 2.6 vs. 3.8 ± 4.2; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The presence of ERCC was the main independent predictor of myocardial viability in late presentation MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gutiérrez et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Late presentation myocardial infarction (n=167). Early recruited coronary collaterals (Rentrop 2-3) vs. Poor coronary collaterals (Rentrop 0-1) was evaluated on Myocardial viability (HR 4.24, 95% CI 1.68-10.6, p=<0.001). Early recruited coronary collaterals independently predicted myocardial viability in late presentation myocardial infarction (HR 4.24; 95% CI 1.68-10.6; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: