Key result
The presence of good coronary collateral circulation was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (OR 2.000; 95% CI 1.116-3.585; P=0.020).
Why the study?
Does good coronary collateral circulation reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Cohort (n=2,286)
Does good coronary collateral circulation reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Contrary to previous studies, good coronary collateral circulation in ACS patients with severe lesions is independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Good CCC should not yet guide ACS risk stratification; leaves open its independent prognostic value pending validation.
BACKGROUND: The presence of good coronary collateral circulation (CCC) can protect and preserve myocardium from ischemia, increase myocardial contractility, and reduce adverse clinical events. However, its impact on mortality is still a topic of debate, particularly in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to investigate the association of CCC with cardiac risk factors and in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of ACS. METHODS: The study population included 2286 patients with ACS who underwent coronary angiography and were found to have at least 90% significant lesion in at least one major coronary artery. The CCC was graded according to the Rentrop classification. The patients were classified into a poor CCC group (Rentrop grades 0-1, n=1859) or a good CCC group (Rentrop grades 2-3, n=427). RESULTS: Patients with good CCC had more high-risk patient characteristics such as older age, higher rate of Killip class of at least 2 at admission, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and impaired renal functions compared with the patients with poor CCC. In multivariate analysis, the presence of good CCC [odds ratio (OR): 2.000; 95% confidence interval: 1.116-3.585; P=0.020], left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% (OR: 2.381; P=0.003), Killip class of at least 2 at admission (OR: 3.609; P<0.001), age of at least 65 years (OR: 2.975; P=0.003), and hemoglobin (OR: 0.797; P=0.003) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: In contrast to previous studies, our study did not confirm a beneficial role of good CCC in patients with ACS; the presence of good CCC was even independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality in the multivariate analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurtul et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (n=2,286). Good coronary collateral circulation (Rentrop grades 2-3) vs. Poor coronary collateral circulation (Rentrop grades 0-1) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 2.000, 95% CI 1.116-3.585, p=0.020). The presence of good coronary collateral circulation was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (OR 2.000; 95% CI 1.116-3.585; P=0.020).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: