Key result
Noninvasive LV pressure-volume loops from brachial pressure and CMR show excellent agreement with invasive stroke work.
Why the study?
Pressure-volume loops provide valuable information on cardiac function but are not readily available in clinical routine or clinical trials.
Does a noninvasive method using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and brachial pressure accurately quantify left ventricular pressure-volume loops compared to invasive measurements?
Observational (n=55)
Does a noninvasive method using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and brachial pressure accurately quantify left ventricular pressure-volume loops compared to invasive measurements?
A novel noninvasive method using cardiovascular magnetic resonance and brachial pressure accurately computes left ventricular pressure-volume loops, offering a potential tool for clinical decision-making and surrogate endpoints in heart failure trials.
Noninvasive LV PV loop computation shows promise in small validation; leaves open utility as HF trial endpoint or clinical tool pending larger studies.
BACKGROUND: Pressure-volume (PV) loops provide a wealth of information on cardiac function but are not readily available in clinical routine or in clinical trials. This study aimed to develop and validate a noninvasive method to compute individualized left ventricular PV loops. METHODS: The proposed method is based on time-varying elastance, with experimentally optimized model parameters from a training set (n=5 pigs), yielding individualized PV loops. Model inputs are left ventricular volume curves from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and brachial pressure. The method was experimentally validated in a separate set (n=9 pig experiments) using invasive pressure measurements and cardiovascular magnetic resonance images and subsequently applied to human healthy controls (n=13) and patients with heart failure (n=28). RESULTS: There was a moderate-to-excellent agreement between in vivo-measured and model-calculated stroke work (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93; bias, -0.02±0.03 J), mechanical potential energy (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.57; bias, -0.04±0.03 J), and ventricular efficiency (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.84; bias, 3.5±2.1%). The model yielded lower ventricular efficiency ( P<0.0001) and contractility ( P<0.0001) in patients with heart failure compared with controls, as well as a higher potential energy ( P<0.0001) and energy per ejected volume ( P<0.0001). Furthermore, the model produced realistic values of stroke work and physiologically representative PV loops. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed the first experimentally validated, noninvasive method to compute left ventricular PV loops and associated quantitative measures. The proposed method shows significant agreement with in vivo-derived measurements and could support clinical decision-making and provide surrogate end points in clinical heart failure trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seemann et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=55). Noninvasive method to compute left ventricular PV loops vs. Invasive pressure measurements and healthy controls was evaluated on Agreement between in vivo-measured and model-calculated stroke work (ICC 0.93). A novel noninvasive method to compute left ventricular pressure-volume loops from brachial pressure and CMR showed excellent agreement with invasive stroke work measurements (ICC 0.93).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: