Key result
Review evaluates EuroSCORE II, STS, and SinoSCORE models for assessing cardiac surgery mortality and complications.
Why the study?
A variety of clinical prediction models have been developed to assess cardiac surgery risks, motivating a review to identify the optimal model for clinical practice.
This review evaluates the application of EuroSCORE II, STS score, and SinoSCORE for predicting mortality and complications in cardiac surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Requires prospective validation before routine use; leaves open optimal model selection for contemporary cardiac surgery.
Risk prediction models are an important part of assessing operative mortality and postoperative complication rates in current cardiac surgery practice. Furthermore, they guide clinical decision-making and perioperative patient management. In recent years, a variety of clinical prediction models have been developed in China and other countries to assess the risk of mortality and complications after cardiac surgery. Currently, the most widely used and mature models are the new version of the European Cardiac Surgery Evaluation System (EuroSCORE II), the American Society of Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Risk Model (STS score), and the Chinese Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Risk Evaluation System (SinoSCORE). This article reviews the application of these three risk prediction models, to identify the optimal model for guiding clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huan Luo (2024) conducted a review in Cardiac surgery. Risk prediction models (EuroSCORE II, STS score, SinoSCORE) was evaluated on Operative mortality and postoperative complications. This review evaluates the application of EuroSCORE II, STS score, and SinoSCORE risk prediction models for assessing operative mortality and complications in cardiac surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: