Why the study?
To develop machine learning models combining preoperative and intraoperative risk factors to predict mortality after cardiac surgery.
Do machine learning models improve the prediction of post-operative mortality in patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery compared to traditional clinical risk scores?
Do machine learning models improve the prediction of post-operative mortality in patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery compared to traditional clinical risk scores?
Machine learning models, particularly random forest, outperformed traditional clinical scoring tools like EuroSCORE II and STS in predicting postoperative mortality after adult cardiac surgery.
ML models incorporating intraoperative factors may improve mortality prediction after cardiac surgery; leaves open external validation against EuroSCORE and STS.
Background: We developed machine learning models that combine preoperative and intraoperative risk factors to predict mortality after cardiac surgery. Methods: Machine learning involving random forest, neural network, support vector machine, and gradient boosting machine was developed and compared with the risk scores of EuroSCORE I and II, Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), as well as a logistic regression model. Clinical data were collected from patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery at the First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital between December 2008 and December 2017. The primary outcome was post-operative mortality. Model performance was estimated using several metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The visualization algorithm was implemented using Shapley's additive explanations. Results: A total of 5,443 patients were enrolled during the study period. The mean EuroSCORE II score was 3.7%, and the actual in-hospital mortality rate was 2.7%. For predicting operative mortality after cardiac surgery, the AUC scores were 0.87, 0.79, 0.81, and 0.82 for random forest, neural network, support vector machine, and gradient boosting machine, compared with 0.70, 0.73, 0.71, and 0.74 for EuroSCORE I and II, STS, and logistic regression model. Shapley's additive explanations analysis of random forest yielded the top-20 predictors and individual-level explanations for each prediction. Conclusions: Machine learning models based on available clinical data may be superior to clinical scoring tools in predicting postoperative mortality in patients following cardiac surgery. Explanatory models show the potential to provide personalized risk profiles for individuals by accounting for the contribution of influencing factors. Additional prospective multicenter studies are warranted to confirm the clinical benefit of these machine learning-driven models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: