Key result
Defibrillation thresholds in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were similar to those in control patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy (10.4 ± 5.8 J vs 11.2 ± 5.6 J).
Why the study?
Does hypertrophic cardiomyopathy increase defibrillation thresholds compared to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy in patients undergoing ICD implantation?
Observational (n=689)
Does hypertrophic cardiomyopathy increase defibrillation thresholds compared to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy in patients undergoing ICD implantation?
Absolute Event Rate: 10.4% vs 11.2%
Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy do not have elevated defibrillation thresholds compared to typical ICD populations, suggesting high-energy devices or complex lead systems are not routinely needed.
Similar thresholds suggest standard ICDs may suffice in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; leaves open prospective confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing is performed in part to ensure an adequate safety margin for the termination of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias. Left ventricular mass is a predictor of high DFTs, so patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are often considered to be at risk for increased defibrillation energy requirements. However, there are little prospective data addressing this issue. OBJECTIVE: To assess DFTs in patients with HCM and evaluate the clinical predictors of elevated DFTs. METHODS: Eighty-nine consecutive patients with HCM and 600 control patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy underwent a uniform modified step-down DFT testing protocol. DFT was compared between the control and HCM populations. Predictors of elevated DFT were evaluated in the HCM group. RESULTS: There was no difference in DFT between HCM and control groups (10.4 ± 5.8 J vs 11.2 ± 5.6 J, respectively). Among patients with HCM, clinical parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction, interventricular septal thickness, left ventricular mass, and QRS duration were not predictive of an elevated DFT. Only 3 patients (3.4%) with HCM had a DFT >20 J. CONCLUSION: Patients with HCM do not have elevated DFTs as compared to more typical populations undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant; high-energy devices or complex lead systems are not needed routinely in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quin et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (n=689). Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing vs. Ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy controls was evaluated on Defibrillation threshold (DFT). Defibrillation thresholds in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were similar to those in control patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy (10.4 ± 5.8 J vs 11.2 ± 5.6 J).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: