Key result
This review discusses evidence for true obstruction to left ventricular outflow in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, focusing on patients with a persistent subaortic pressure gradient at rest.
This discussion focuses on the hemodynamic classification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the evidence for true left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.
Supports true LVOT obstruction in resting-gradient HCM; leaves open prospective validation of classification and management.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is characterized by symmetrical or asymmetrical hypertrophy of the left and/or right ventricles (Table 1). It is a primary disorder of heart muscle in which the site and extent of the hypertrophic process are believed to be of importance in determining the disease manifestations (30). In this discussion we will limit our remarks to the commonest form of HCM, that is associated with ventricular (asymmetrical) septal hypertrophy (Table 1). It has been traditional to hemodynamically classify this form of HCM into obstructive and nonobstructive types, depending on whether or not there is a pressure gradient across the left ventricular outflow tract due to mitral leaflet-septal contact (5, 21, 30). In obstructive HCM this pressure gradient may be persistent (gradient at rest), labile (spontaneously variable), or latent (provocable) (5, 30, 31). In discussing whether there is true obstruction to left ventricular outflow in obstructive HCM, we will focus our attention on the situation in which there is a persistent subaortic pressure gradient at rest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wigle et al. (1988) conducted a review in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This review discusses evidence for true obstruction to left ventricular outflow in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, focusing on patients with a persistent subaortic pressure gradient at rest.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: