Key result
Planned cohort compares 14-day mHealth rhythm monitoring to standard ECG for detecting ventricular arrhythmias.
Why the study?
Patients with HCM are at increased risk of SCD, but reliable data on the clinical benefit of prolonged arrhythmia monitoring are rare.
Does prolonged mHealth-based continuous rhythm monitoring over 14 days improve the detection of ventricular arrhythmias compared to standard 24- or 48-hour ECG in patients with low- to intermediate-risk hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=34)
No
Does prolonged mHealth-based continuous rhythm monitoring over 14 days improve the detection of ventricular arrhythmias compared to standard 24- or 48-hour ECG in patients with low- to intermediate-risk hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
This study protocol outlines an investigation into whether 14-day mHealth-based ECG monitoring increases the detection of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia compared to standard 24-48 hour monitoring in patients with low-to-intermediate risk hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular arrhythmias and other arrhythmias. Screening for arrhythmias is mandatory to assess the individual SCD risk, but long-term electrocardiography (ECG) is rarely performed in routine clinical practice. Intensified monitoring may increase the detection rate of ventricular arrhythmias and identify more patients with an increased SCD risk who are potential candidates for the primary prophylactic implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. To date, reliable data on the clinical benefit of prolonged arrhythmia monitoring in patients with HCM are rare. OBJECTIVE This prospective study aims to measure the prevalence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with HCM observed by mobile health (mHealth)–based continuous rhythm monitoring over 14 days compared to standard practice (a 24- and 48-h long-term ECG). The frequency of ventricular arrhythmias in this 14-day period is compared with the frequency in the first 24 or 48 hours for the same patient (intraindividual comparison). METHODS Following the sample size calculation, 34 patients with a low or intermediate risk for SCD, assessed by the HCM Risk–SCD calculator, will need to be recruited in this single-center cohort study between June 2023 and February 2024. All patients will receive an ECG patch that records their heart activity over 14 days. In addition, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing data will be integrated into risk stratification. All patients will be asked to complete questionnaires about their symptoms; previous therapy; family history; and, at the end of the study, their experience with the ECG patch-based monitoring. RESULTS The Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Impact of a Prolonged mHealth-Based Arrhythmia Monitoring by Single-Channel ECG (HCM-PATCH) study investigates the prevalence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (ie, ≥3 consecutive ventricular beats at a rate of 120 beats per minute, lasting for <30 seconds) in low- to intermediate-risk patients with HCM (according to the HCM Risk–SCD calculator) with additional mHealth-based prolonged rhythm monitoring. The study was funded by third-party funding from the Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ostwestfalen-Lippe of Bielefeld University in June 2023 and approved by the institutional review board in May 2023. Data collection began in June 2023, and we plan to end the study in February 2024. Of the 34 patients, 26 have been recruited. Data analysis has not yet taken place. Publication of the results is planned for the fall of 2024. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged mHealth-based rhythm monitoring could lead to differences in the prevalence of arrhythmias compared to 24- and 48-hour long-term ECGs. This may lead to improved identification of patients at high risk and trigger therapeutic interventions that may provide better protection from SCD or atrial fibrillation–related complications such as embolic stroke. CLINICALTRIAL Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien DRKS00032144; https://tinyurl.com/498bkrx8 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/52035
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lammers et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=34). mHealth-based continuous rhythm monitoring (ECG patch) vs. Standard practice (24- and 48-hour long-term ECG) was evaluated on Prevalence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. 14-day mHealth-based continuous rhythm monitoring is being evaluated in a planned 34-patient cohort to determine the prevalence of ventricular arrhythmias compared to standard 24-48 hour ECG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: