Key result
Implementation of a dedicated chest pain triage protocol using coronary CTA significantly decreased length of stay from 28.8 to 14.0 hours (p<0.001) and safely identified patients for discharge.
Why the study?
Does implementation of a coronary CTA-based triage protocol safely guide management and reduce length of stay in ED patients with low-risk chest pain?
Cohort (n=529)
Yes
Does implementation of a coronary CTA-based triage protocol safely guide management and reduce length of stay in ED patients with low-risk chest pain?
Effect estimate: 51% decrease
Absolute Event Rate: 14% vs 28.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
Implementation of a dedicated coronary CTA triage protocol in the ED for low-risk chest pain safely allows early discharge and significantly reduces length of stay.
May support reduced ED stays with CTA triage in low-risk chest pain; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cury et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Acute chest pain with low risk of acute coronary syndrome (n=529). Coronary CT angiography (CTA) triage protocol vs. Before implementation of triage protocol was evaluated on Length of stay (LOS) (51% decrease, p=<0.001). Implementation of a dedicated chest pain triage protocol using coronary CTA significantly decreased length of stay from 28.8 to 14.0 hours (p<0.001) and safely identified patients for discharge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: